When you're considering parts for your prototype, take a moment to think about your part numbering system. If your prototype is right, and you move to production, organization will be a big part of what makes/breaks you as you scale.
Essentially, when it comes to naming your parts, your choices are an intelligent part numbering scheme, or a non-intelligent part numbering scheme. If you're trying to decide which one is right for you, here are a few pros and cons of intelligent part numbering.
(And go here for another full article on the advantages/disadvantages of intelligent part numbering.)
A few pros/cons of intelligent part numbering
|Advantages||Why it works|
|Efficient searching -||If you’ve labeled all resistors with part numbers starting with ‘RES’ (for example), you can more easily group similar parts in your design documentation together and swiftly sort among them.|
|Clear frame of reference for each part -||Descriptive part numbers specify the group to which every part belongs, so you can immediately see when a part is in the wrong group.|
|Process efficiency -||Because parts with similar naming conventions are all handled the same way, you can predefine the change routings, review processes and manufacturing steps for each part number class or category.|
|Disadvantages - ||Why it’s a challenge|
|Training and knowledge required -||The individual responsible for assigning part numbers must understand which group to place the part in and how subgroups interact. Because so much is based on the naming convention, mis-naming a part can jeopardize the product design.|
|Ongoing maintenance -||Descriptive part numbers require foresight and continual adjustment as you incorporate new parts into your design. Part group sizes must also be considered in advance so you don’t get stuck with a significant number string 0-9 and an eleventh part.|